Basic Informations

C.V

Curriculum Vitae

Name : Ahmed Mohamed Atef

Address : 9 El andia St. Ismailia, Egypt

Tel. : +2 01156668836 +2 01065448430

 064 3209603

E-mail : Ahmedatefabdelgafar@Gmail.com

Personal Informaon

Birth Date : 9/1/1985

Naonality : Egypan

Marital Status : Married

Status of military recruitment : Exempted

Educaon and qualificaons

Postgraduate qualificaons: MsC. of Oral and

Maxillofacial surgery from Suez Canal University (2015)

Primary qualificaon: B.D.S., Faculty of Denstry, Suez Canal University with

overall grade very good with honor, 2007.

Work Experience

Academic experience and Research

¦ Assistant lecturer at maxillofacial surgery department ,beni swief university from 4/2019 II now.

¦ Assistant lecturer at maxillofacial surgery department, Sinai University from

10/2015 ll 3/2019

¦ Demonstrator at maxillofacial surgery department, Sinai University from

3/2011 ll 9/2015.

¦ Publicaon: A Comparave Study between Lidocaine and Methyl Salicylate

Patches in Treatment of Myofascial Pain. Internaonal Clinical Oral and

Maxillofacial Surgery; 1(2)20-23, 2015.

Clinical Experience

¦ Denst in Suez Canal University Hospital from 2/2009 ll 2/2011.

¦ Internship in Faculty of Denstry, Suez Canal University from 11/2007 ll

10/2008.

Computer Skills

¦ Windows.

¦ Microso office (Excel - Word – Power point).

¦ Internet skills

Languages

Arabic : Mother tongue.

English : Fluent in speaking& wring.

Hobbies

- Playing football

- Running

- Swimming

REFERENCES FURNISHED UPON REQUEST.

Master Title

A comparative study between lidocaine and methyl salicylate patches in treatment of myofascial pain

Master Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare lidocaine versus methyl salicylate patches in treatment of myofascial pain. Thirty patients suffered from myofascial pain in head and neck muscles aging from 20 to 45 of either sex were divided randomly into three groups. Group one (10 patients) considered for treatment with methyl salicylate patch, group two (10 patients) were treated through lidocaine patch and group three (10 patients) acted as a controlled group through the application of plain patches without any active ingredient. Patients rated their baseline pain intensity level, both at rest and with movement, using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where (o) indicate no pain , (20) slight pain , (40) mild pain , (60) moderate pain ,(80) sever pain , and (100) extreme pain (that could not tolerated). Degree of mouth opening measured through the calibration of the inter incisal distance. (Normal inter incisal distance range from 40 to 55 mm). Both range of motion (lateral movement) and the disability resulting from painful symptoms (measured as pain – related interference in usual daily activity, mood, work activity or quality of life) were assessed. Each patient received one patch that replaced by the patient every twelve hours; the patient informed to remove the last patch twelve hours before the visit on fifth day. All parameters (pain intensity, degree of mouth opening, range of motion and disability) were repeated on fifth day (twelve hours after removal of the last patch) and on the ninth day (after fthe last patch) and on the ninth day (after four days of follow up).Pain intensity level showed a significant reduction on pain intensity scores after the 1st session (fifth day) followed by slightly more reduction in pain intensity after ninth days period for group 1 and group 2. Both degree of mouth opening and range of motion (lateral movement) showed a significant increase after the first session 78 (fifth day) followed by slightly more increase after session 2 (ninth day) for group 1 and group 2 but with group 3 there were no any improvement. A significant reduction on pain intensity scores after the 1st session (fifth day) followed by an insignificant reduction on Daily activity after the ninth day period for group 1 and group 2 with An insignificant difference in Daily activity after different follow-up periods for group 3.our days of follow up).Pain intensity

PHD Title

Comparative Clinical Study between Titanium Three-Dimensions Mini Plates versus Stainless Steel Three-Dimensions Mini Plates in Treating Anterior Mandibular Fractures

PHD Abstract

Summary The treatment of mandibular fractures has been in a constant state of evolution over the past few decades, with the optimal management of anterior mandibular fractures continuing to change. Although the techniques of fracture management have changed it significantly, the goals have not .Accurate reduction of the fractures, maintenance of premorbid occlusion, and early return to function are the keys to successful management of these fractures. 3D plates with quadrangular shape formed by joining two mini-plates with interconnecting crossbars, to meet the requirements of semi - rigid fixation with lesser complications. Because of the quadrangular configuration of the plates, they provided three dimensional stability and resistance to torsional forces. The present study was directed to evaluate the efficacy of 3 D titanium mini plates versus 3D stainless steel mini plates in treating anterior mandibular fractures Twenty patients were selected from Suez Canal University hospital department of general surgery of both genders within the age group 18–50 years with isolated displaced non comminuted anterior mandibular fractures. Patients with preoperative infection at the site of fracture, medically compromised, mixed dentition, or with less mandibular vertical height between root apex of teeth and lower border of mandible presuming that 3D plate will not fit a vertically short mandible were excluded from the study. Twenty patients (n = 20) were divided randomly into 2 groups. Group I (n = 10) was treated by open reduction and internal fixation using 2-mm 3D titanium miniplate using Champy’s principles of osteosynthesis Group II (n = 10) was treated by open reduction and internal fixation using 2-mm 3D. Stainless steel plates Patients posted for surgery under all aseptic precautions, under general anesthesia Intraoral translabial incision was placed, fracture site was identified, reduced, and temporary IMF was placed, and satisfactory occlusion was achieved. Was done either using a 3D 2-mm stainless steel plate or 3D titanium mini plates using Champy’s principles of osteosynthesis. Three-dimensional mini plates were placed in the way as described by Farmand and Dupoirieux in which the horizontal bars was perpendicular to fracture line and vertical ones was parallel to it. After plate fixation, the occlusion was verified again, and surgical site was copiously irrigated with 5% povidone-iodine and followed by normal saline. Hemostasis was achieved and closure was done. Operating time from will be noted. Postoperative IMF was avoided and was preferred only when occlusion deranged postoperatively. Soft diet was recommended for six weeks postoperatively. Follow-up of patient was done for 4 months at the interval of 1 week, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 4 months for all parameters. The parameters of the study was wound dehiscence (presence or absence), segmental mobility (presence or absence), postoperative occlusion disturbance (presence or absence), need for postoperative IMF, need for plate removal, working time and radiological evaluation of reduction and fixation. Significant results were observed in duration of Plate Adaptation to Definite Fixation (PA-DF interval) more in 3D stainless steel plate system. Difficulty was encountered with 3D stainless steel plate adaptation on curved bony contours in symphysis region. No significant difference was observed in clinical outcome (Oral functions, occlusion & stability of fracture fragments) of 3D stainless steel plate system and 3D titanium plate system. We recommend the usage of 3D stainless steel plates for fixation of non-comminuted mandibular fractures, with a definite advantage of cost effectiveness. It is also recommended to reduce the width of the struts in the stainless steel 3D plates to enhance its malleability and application to wider regions in the maxillofacial skeleton.